The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Crescenzio RIVELLINI (EPP, IT) recommending the European Parliament to grant the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2009.
The committee cites that in 2009 the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) had commitment appropriations available amounting to a total of EUR 122 million (2008: EUR 118 million), with a utilisation rate of 98.02%, higher than the average of the other institutions (97.69%).
Internal malfunctioning of the EESC’s Secretariat-General: Members notes with concern the allegations in relation to management within the EESC, which have led to a sanctioned case of internal complaint (whistleblowing). They also note that, on 11 March 2011, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) decided to open an investigation, and request the EESC and OLAF to report to the discharge authority on the progress and outcome of the case. Members consider that the allegations presented to OLAF clearly affect the reputation of the Union as they refer to the internal functioning of one its institutions, the EESC, and relate to a serious malfunctioning by its secretariat. They consider, furthermore, that the identified disruption practices are not limited to a single action, but may represent continuous irregularities that constitute an alleged case of maladministration;
These allegations relate primarily, but not exclusively, to the following:
Members, therefore, call on the EESC and, in particular, on its Secretary General, to cooperate fully with OLAF and to provide all necessary assistance to OLAF agents to carry out their investigation. They also request the EESC and in particular its Secretary-General to report to Parliament's committee responsible for the discharge procedure on:
Members also call on the Ombudsman to inform Parliament's committee responsible for the discharge procedure, as soon as possible, of the results of its investigations, in particular with regard to the irregularities concerning the staff promotion procedure, since the Ombudsman has been requested to act in this specific case.
Audit of the EESC: Members note that the annual report of the Court of Auditors did not give rise to any significant observations as regards the EESC. They, nevertheless, call on the Court to confirm whether the audits of the 2009 reports found any evidence of irregularities that have already been the subject of disciplinary case No 2/2007.
As regards the rest, Members note:
Members reconfirm their position that declarations of financial interests of members of all Union institutions should be accessible on the Internet via a public register and request that the EESC take steps to make public the relevant information, and to follow up this issue in its Annual Activity Report.