Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies in the Union

2015/2010(INL)

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report by Anneliese DODDS (S&D, UK) and Luděk NIEDERMAYER (EPP, CR) in which recommendations are set out to the Commission on bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies in the Union.

These recommendations build on the work of Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings (TAXE Committee), set up in the wake of the “Luxleaks” revelations. While respecting Member States' sovereignty in relation to tax policy, the report considered that there is a need for EU legislative measures to improve transparency, coordination and convergence within corporate tax policies in the Union.

The present report lists a series of measures that call for the Commission to propose as legislative acts.

Transparency: Members called on the European Commission to:

  • take all the necessary steps to introduce by the first quarter of 2016 comprehensive and public country-by-country reporting (CBC-R) for all multinational companies, in all sectors;
  • create, as soon as possible, on a voluntary European 'Fair Tax Payer' label for companies who engage in good tax practices. Companies should be motivated by the label to make paying a fair share of taxes an essential part of their corporate social responsibility policy;
  • establish a new mechanism whereby Member States are compelled to inform other Member States and the Commission without delay if they intend to introduce a new allowance, relief, exemption, incentive or similar measure that could have a material impact on the effective tax rate in the Member State or on the tax base of another Member State;
  • bring forward a legislative proposal to protect whistleblowers who act in the public interest only in order to expose misconduct, wrongdoing, fraud or illegal activity in relation to corporate taxation in any Member State in the European Union. Such whistleblowers should be protected and such protection should be coherent with the overall legal system and be effective against unjustified legal prosecutions.

Coordination: Members called on the European Commission to:

  • present a legislative proposal for the introduction of a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCT). More specifically, as a first step, by June 2016, a mandatory Common Corporate Tax Base in the Union which subsequently should be consolidated (CCCTB);
  • strengthen the mandate and improve transparency of the Council Code of Conduct Working Group on Business Taxation;
  • continue to provide guidance regarding “patent boxes” which are special tax regimes for intellectual property revenues:
  • bring forward proposals for common European standards and definitions on what qualifies as the promotion of research and development, and what does not, and for harmonising the use of patent and innovation boxes;
  • bring forward a proposal to amend the Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to ensure more effective simultaneous tax audits and controls where two or more national tax authorities decide to conduct controls of one or more persons of common or complementary interests;
  • table a proposal for a European Tax Identification Number (TIN);

Convergence: Members called on the European Commission to:

  • table a legislative proposal to allow the Union to speak with one voice in relation to international tax arrangements;
  • negotiate tax agreements with third countries on behalf of the Union instead of the current practice under which bilateral negotiations are conducted, which produce sub-optimal results;
  • create a common and cogent definition of 'tax havens'. In this regard, the Commission should put forward a revised list of tax havens, which would replace its interim list as put forward in June 2015. A catalogue of counter-measures should be created for those who use tax havens. These counter-measures may include being banned from accessing state aid or public procurement opportunities at Union or national level;
  • harmonise national definitions of debt, equity, opaque and transparent entities, harmonise the attribution of assets and liabilities to permanent establishment, and harmonise the allocation of costs and profits between different entities within the same group;
  • bring forward a proposal by summer 2016 to improve the current mechanisms to resolve cross-border taxation disputes in the Union, not only focusing on cases of double taxation but also double non-taxation;
  • introduce a withholding tax or a measure of similar effect, to ensure that all profits generated within the Union, and due to leave, are effectively taxed within the Union before they leave the Union’s borders;
  • address the tax gap by, inter alia: (i) investigating sources of low efficiency regarding tax collection, including VAT collection; (ii) ensuring that tax authorities have full and meaningful access to central registers of beneficial ownership for both companies and trusts, and that those registers are properly maintained and verified.