The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Amjad BASHIR (ECR, UK) on statelessness in South and South East Asia.
The report recalled that the right to nationality has been enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for close to seventy years, yet for millions of people this is still seemingly unattainable. The international definition of a stateless person is a person who is not considered as a national by any state under the operation of its law. The UNHCR has estimated that 135 million children under the age of five across the region have not had their births registered and are at risk of becoming stateless.
The causes of statelessness include less nefarious but problematic ones like the expiration of nationality through having lived out of ones country for an extended period of time. Nevertheless, there are more causes that are source of serious concern.
Statelessness continues to receive limited international attention despite its very worrying global and regional human rights implications, and continues to be seen as an internal affair of states. Reducing and eventually abolishing statelessness should become a human rights priority at international level, according to Members.
Overall, Members expressed concern about the millions of cases of statelessness all around the world, in particular in South and South East Asia, and expressed their solidarity with stateless persons.
Rohingya minority: in particular, they are concerned about the situation of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar. They are the worlds largest population of stateless peoples making up nearly 20% of global statelessness. Members are appalled at the reports of massive human rights violations and the continued repression and discrimination of the Rohingya and the failure to recognise them as part of Myanmar society, in what looks like a coordinated campaign of ethnic cleansing.
They urged:
Enhanced communication on the issue: Members emphasised the importance of an effective communication strategy on statelessness in order to raise awareness. The EU is called upon to improve communication on statelessness, in cooperation with the UNHCR, and through its delegations in the third countries concerned.
EU strategy: Members called on the EU to develop a comprehensive strategy on statelessness based on two sets of measures: (i) urgent situations; (ii) long-term measures to end statelessness. It should focus on a limited number of priorities and that the EU should take the lead in the event of urgent situations to raise awareness on statelessness at international level. The EUs comprehensive strategy on statelessness should be adaptable to specific situations faced by stateless people. A distinction needs to be made between statelessness that has occurred as a result of a lack of administrative capacity and statelessness that has occurred as a result of a discriminatory state policy against certain communities or minorities.
New comprehensive policy approach: recommending that Member States make it a priority to support the positive developments in addressing statelessness in South and Southeast Asia, Members proposed a new comprehensive policy approach including, inter alia:
Recalling that statelessness in the world is largely unmapped and under-reported, and that existing data are based on different definitions, Members urged the international community to adopt a unified definition and to address the gaps in data collection for measuring statelessness in developing countries.
The Commission is called upon to launch exchanges of good practice among Member States and encourage the active coordination of national statelessness contact points.
Lastly, Members welcomed the EU support to stateless persons in South and South East Asia through various instruments and encouraged the Union to continue its efforts in order to address the impact of statelessness on development, peace and stability as an integral part of its development cooperation programmes and, more broadly, its external action.